• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Notification redundancy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Notification redundancy


  • Subject: Re: Notification redundancy
  • From: Ben Dougall <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:40:09 +0000

On Thursday, January 29, 2004, at 01:25 pm, Allan Odgaard wrote:

On 28. Jan 2004, at 16:09, Erez Anzel wrote:

I have enjoyed using the notification system built into Cocoa. But the standard approach may not be the wisest in my situation, where I may have tens of thousands of objects sending notifications, and multiple observers.

You may reduce it by using NSIndexSet -- but that would be more or less the same as letting the action method send the notify.

In a case like this, it's more efficient for the action method to post the notification, instead of each object. I could make a decision at runtime as to whether the action posts the notification, or each object, depending upon how many objects are involved. But this starts to get messy; I have many different actions, many object types, and many "set" methods for each.

Any wisdom on this issue?

You could let the objects add info about what they did to their container and let the container send the notify, then, if anybody wants to know exactly what happend, they would query the sender of the notification.

But do all these 50,000 objects really need to be NSObject subclasses? i.e. do they need any of the advantages that comes with being an object (run-time polymorph method invocation, inheritance etc.), or are they just simple points, to which you have added some action methods (which could just as well be "global" functions)?

50,000 notification is 50,000 notifications. if all the objects really need to be notified, which i guess they do, otherwise you wouldn't be asking the question, then you're going to have to make 50,000 notifications. i don't think there's any getting away from that.

if making one notification 50,000 times, in a single go that is, reaches some kind of limit/problem, then you could split up the notifications, to get round that limit/problem, and achieve a kind of tree notification structure - the root node notifies its children, who notify their children etc until all 50,000 objects have been notified - that way you're not making a single notification 50,000 times in one go -- but you're still making 50,000 notifications.

does making 50,000 notifications in one go cause a problem? if so, split 'em up, if not, don't. just a thought.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Notification redundancy
      • From: j o a r <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Notification redundancy (From: Allan Odgaard <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Notification redundancy
  • Next by Date: Re: Notification redundancy
  • Previous by thread: Re: Notification redundancy
  • Next by thread: Re: Notification redundancy
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread