Re: Re: Cocoa Bindings Question(s)
Re: Re: Cocoa Bindings Question(s)
- Subject: Re: Re: Cocoa Bindings Question(s)
- From: <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:17:49 -0400
>
From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
>
On Jul 20, 2004, at 6:18 AM, email@hidden wrote:
>
>
> When it's named setBooksList, and the array is created in -init, it is
>
> called. (when the array is not created, the error is shown).
>
> When it's named setbooksList, whether or not the array is created in
>
> -init, the method is NOT called. The booksList variable must be being
>
> access directly? Something strange is going on... does capitalization
>
> matter or not?
>
>
>
Capitalisation is important:
>
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/
>
KeyValueCoding/Concepts/AccessorConventions.html>
>
>
I'll file a bug to have a sentence added to make explicit that this is
>
the case (pun sort of intended).
>
>
mmalc
Just so I understand.. when the captialization is wrong (setbooksList), the method is "not found", so the member variable is accessed directly (and the array is created if necessary? since not having the alloc/init still works), but when named correctly (setBooksList), it's "found" and accessed, but the array (or item) is null so the error is generated.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.