Re: Consistent naming interfaces across all the Apple's Framework
Re: Consistent naming interfaces across all the Apple's Framework
- Subject: Re: Consistent naming interfaces across all the Apple's Framework
- From: Dan Bernstein <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:14:33 +0300
I don't know what you mean by "something done" (by whom?), but Apple
does publish pretty detailed naming guidelines as part of
<
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/index.html>.
If you see an Apple method whose name doesn't follow the guidelines,
file it as a bug.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:40:07 -0700, Stiphane Sudre <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
Is there something done to have consistent names across the various and
>
numerous Cocoa Frameworks?
>
>
For instance, in the AppKit, delegate methods looks like this AFAIK:
>
>
- (void) transactionDidAbort:(id) aParameter;
>
>
In one kit, I've seen this:
>
>
- (void) transactionAborted:(id) aParameter;
>
>
The issue being that being used to the AppKit naming rules, you have to
>
read the headers to get the real name of the method instead of relying
>
on your experience with other frameworks.
>
>
My $0.02
>
_______________________________________________
>
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.