Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData, but less expensive)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData, but less expensive)

Subject: Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData, but less expensive)
From: Scott Stevenson <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:12:23 -0700


On Sep 23, 2004, at 5:14 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:

Are there numbers to suggest that most people have moved to Panther?
At CocoaDev [1] someone pointed toward:
   http://update.omnigroup.com/
Here you can find numbers published by the good people at OmniGroup, it says 92.5% are using Panther -- these numbers are among users of OmniGroup software.


Panther appears to have had phenomenal sell-through success.

Check out Watson's numbers three weeks after Panther was released:
http://weblog.karelia.com/MacOSX/Followup_on_users_s.html


      - Scott

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData,	but less expensive)
From: Ricky Sharp <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData,	but less expensive) (From: Allan Odgaard <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
applicationShouldOpenUntitledFile: activity causes AE-related	crash?!?

Next by Date:
Re: Add duplicate menu items

Previous by thread:
Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData,	but less expensive)

Next by thread:
Re: Panther or Jaguar as requirement (was: reloadData,	but less expensive)

Index(es):

Date
Thread