Re: ADC Core Data article
Re: ADC Core Data article
- Subject: Re: ADC Core Data article
- From: "Timothy Reaves" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:25:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Importance: Normal
>
> Am 05.04.2005 um 17:33 schrieb mmalcolm crawford:
>> May be of interest to some:
>> <http://developer.apple.com/macosx/tiger/coredata.html>
>
>
> I read here:
>
>> Each entity definition in a managed object model requires the name of
>> the entity and the name of the class used at runtime to represent that
>> entity. By default, the class used is NSManagedObject, but the class
>> may be either NSManagedObject or a subclass thereof.
>
> I read that phrase 5 times. Is that really true? Only subclasses of
> NSManagedObject get managed persistency from Core Data?
>
>
> Re
> Phil
>
>
I've seen no one comment on what looks to be rather nasty: it appears that
the only way to use CoreData is to access the values via KVC. So they
turn my objects into maps? I'm not sure I like that. KVC isn't very
pretty, nor easy to use. It is nice for some things (remember value
channels?), but I'd still like my objects to be objects.
Unfortunalty I'll have to wait longer to see what it's really like. I
wish they'd go ahead and release the full API docs.
Ah well.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden