Re: Adding Spotlight keywords to files
Re: Adding Spotlight keywords to files
- Subject: Re: Adding Spotlight keywords to files
- From: Guy English <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:24:28 -0400
Hi,
You could append "screenshot" into the Finder ( now Spotlight )
comments field. You'll need to look into Carbon stuff, the comments
are stored in the resource fork I believe.
Guy
On 8/5/05, Ben Haller <email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi! I've been poking through developer docs and list archives for
> a while, and I believe this question remains unanswered, although I
> saw it asked a few times by others:
>
> Can an app simply add metadata to an existing file (one it
> creates, even), without being the owner of that file and without
> having an "importer"? If not, is this because there just isn't API
> to do it at the moment, or is this idea in fact contrary to the
> design of Spotlight?
>
> A practical example. I have a screenshot app. It lets the user
> choose what other app will "own" the screenshots it saves; you can
> make them be GraphicConverter files, Photoshop files, Preview files,
> whatever. My app is not itself capable of opening image files at
> all; it can only create them. So obviously my app cannot have a
> Spotlight importer.
> I want my app to tag all the files it creates as being
> "screenshots" by tagging them with a keyword. This would let the
> user quickly and easily find screenshots they had taken, regardless
> of where they had ended up, and that strikes me as useful. If
> Spotlight can't do things like that, I think users will be
> disappointed...
>
> I haven't seen this explicitly stated, but the more I read, the
> more I get the impression that a stake for Spotlight is that the
> metadata for a file must always be able to be regenerated from the
> file's data; metadata can never contain its own unique information,
> it can only hold up a mirror, as it were, to the data already in the
> file. If this is true, then presumably there will never be a way for
> the user to just tag a bunch of files as being "related to project
> XYZ"; if that metadata were lost, there would be no way to recreate
> it, since the files themselves don't know they are part of project
> XYZ. Such a tag would violate the fundamental design of Spotlight.
> Is this correct? If so, it seems like a major, major limitation.
>
> Ben Haller
> Stick Software
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden