Re: Distributed Objects between cats
Re: Distributed Objects between cats
- Subject: Re: Distributed Objects between cats
- From: Aurélien Hugelé <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:05:44 +0200
On 12 août 05, at 10:59, mmalcolm crawford wrote:
On Aug 12, 2005, at 1:43 AM, Aurélien Hugelé wrote:
But as Wade said, it is not well documented (it took me for
example several days to understand why bycopy did not work as
expected, only *old* WO lists explain that you should implement -
(id)replacementObjectForPortCoder:(NSPortCoder *)encoder to
override NSObject default implementation).
I believe this covers it?
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/
DistrObjects/Tasks/substitutions.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20000769>
Please, though, submit enhancement requests.
Yes you are right, but it is too much specific :
i was trying to use the "bycopy" keyword of objC in the context of
DO. i never wanted to "make substitutions during message encoding" !!!
in the bycopy documentation (related to objectiveC LANGUAGE) there is
no reference to DO and necessity to "make substitutions during
message encoding" to make the bycopy keyword effective !
i think you'll agree with me : when you want to pass object by copy
(instead of by reference) you'll never think you have to "make
substitutions during message encoding" :) so i NEVER read this part
of the documentation because the title was not related to my problem
at all !
Can you link this topic in the bycopy keyword usage context maybe ?
Hope this helps !
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40gumitech.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden