• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap


  • Subject: Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap
  • From: Alexander von Below <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:14:54 +0100


On 21.12.2005, at 12:32, Uli Kusterer wrote:

The Developer Transition Kits are nowhere near what the final Intel Macs will be like, and Apple is still working on the OS version to be shipped with the first Intel Macs. So, even *Apple* doesn't know how an Intel Mac will look and behave. They have been known to completely change how Intel-Mac programs are stored in ways that broke existing Intel-Mac applications. There's no way you can ship a working Intel-Mac application that is guaranteed to work when the next Mac OS for Intel pre-release comes out.

This is getting off-topic, but I think your statement is a little too harsh. Yes, one should be aware that everything is subject to change, but if there was not a certain "direction" in these things then why should Apple and the Developers even bother?

Just create a PowerPC version of your app that they'll (hopefully) be able to run in Rosetta, and do the Intel version when there are actual Intel-Macs.

The term "hopefully" makes it clear that there is no certainty for him in doing this either. Who knows how Rosetta will run?

Finally, I don't think the NDA most developers signed when they rented their DTKs allows them to let anyone not from their company run code on these machines.

That is probably true, but I am not a lawyer. That said, if Stefan has an existing ADC Membership (even Student or Online), there should be perfectly legal ways to settle this. Otherwise it would not make much sense for companies to offer x86 porting if they must keep the project status a secret.
However, especially as to mailing lists the NDA also prohibits me from clarifying some of your statements above, even though they could use some serious clarification.

But what I can say is this: If an application is "plain Cocoa", no hardware access or other oddities, then I believe Steve Jobs said something to the effect that you can create working Universal Binaries with a single click. And we all believe Steve, don't we?

Bye

Alex
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap
      • From: Markus Hitter <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Testing universal binary one the cheap (From: Stefan Pantos <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap (From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Lots of items in an NSOutline view.
  • Next by Date: Re: Implementing a scrollable icon-table
  • Previous by thread: Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap
  • Next by thread: Re: Testing universal binary one the cheap
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread