Re: Binding name must be same as ivar name?
Re: Binding name must be same as ivar name?
- Subject: Re: Binding name must be same as ivar name?
- From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:52:06 -0800
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:39 AM, glenn andreas wrote:
The real power of "binding names need not correspond" isn't just "use
a different name" but that you can have derived information bound and
automatically updated when the data it is derived from changes.
Although correct, this is a different issue. This relates to an object
being bound to, not the object being bound.
mmalc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden