Re: [Moderator] EOT Re: NYT confirms rumor of Apple switch to Intel
Re: [Moderator] EOT Re: NYT confirms rumor of Apple switch to Intel
- Subject: Re: [Moderator] EOT Re: NYT confirms rumor of Apple switch to Intel
- From: Nicko van Someren <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:07:21 +0100
On 6 Jun 2005, at 20:54, mmalcolm crawford wrote:
On Jun 6, 2005, at 8:39 AM, Nicko van Someren wrote:
Discussion of rumours such as this is not appropriate for this list.
How about discussion of the implications of having to build apps
with fat binaries?
For most Cocoa development, I suspect that there will be very
little to say. Cocoa and its ancestors have run on several
platforms in the past, and there has typically -- as suggested in
the keynote -- been little more to do than simply check the
appropriate box.
For those concerned about endian issues, there are already
functions both to discover the endian-ness of the host, and to do
appropriate byte-swapping -- see, for example, NSHostByteOrder,
NSSwapBigDoubleToHost. etc.:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Reference/
Foundation/ObjC_classic/Functions/FoundationFunctions.html>
Beyond that, there should be little for developers working at the
level of abstraction of the Cocoa APIs to be concerned about...
Thanks for the pointer. I also notice that Apple have posted a very
comprehensive document which probably covers most areas of concern
for Cocoa programmers at: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/
MacOSX/Conceptual/universal_binary/universal_binary.pdf
Cheers,
Nicko
----
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax
si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden