Re: osX86 and frameworks
Re: osX86 and frameworks
- Subject: Re: osX86 and frameworks
- From: Mark Lively <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:27:04 -0700
On Jun 6, 2005, at 5:17 PM, email@hidden wrote:
Well, the good news is that Frameworks, kernel extensions, and apps
can all be built as universal binaries. This is due to the bundle
format Apple adopted for OS X back when it debuted as the Public
Beta. So, the framework would be built as a universal binary, and
then you just build another universal binary for your app linking
to the universal binary version of the framework.
It is simple enough, that I think you should have little to no
problem with the transisition for this piece of software. :)
Have been.
Cocoa Apps convert with almost no changes.
I kinda figured that they would. So much of Cocoa is in the frameworks.
Take a look at the size of your binaries. That is the true
indication of how much changing work your application needs. As
Steve said in the keynote, Java and Scripting languages just work.
ASS and Java-cocoa should be good to go.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden