Re: x86 Compilation
Re: x86 Compilation
- Subject: Re: x86 Compilation
- From: Clark Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:04:33 -0400
Oh, I'm just talking about the actual executable file. The other files
in a bundled app wouldn't have to be doubled.
On 6/7/05, Rail Jon Rogut <email@hidden> wrote:
> That's what I thought :^) (Worst case scenario).. I thought perhaps the
> resources (strings, icons, etc) could be shared.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clark Cox [mailto:email@hidden]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:42 PM
> To: email@hidden
> Cc: cocoa List
> Subject: Re: x86 Compilation
>
>
> On 6/7/05, Rail Jon Rogut <email@hidden> wrote:
> > So what's the size difference between a universal binary and the ppc binary?
>
> Well, roughly 2x. :)
>
> --
> Clark S. Cox III
> email@hidden
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/clarkcox3/
> http://homepage.mac.com/clarkcox3/
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.5 - Release Date: 6/7/2005
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.5 - Release Date: 6/7/2005
>
>
--
Clark S. Cox III
email@hidden
http://www.livejournal.com/users/clarkcox3/
http://homepage.mac.com/clarkcox3/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden