• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: x86 Compilation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: x86 Compilation


  • Subject: Re: x86 Compilation
  • From: Frederick Cheung <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:20:03 +0100


On 7 Jun 2005, at 21:44, Frederick Cheung wrote:


On 7 Jun 2005, at 21:40, Robert Tillyard wrote:


How do you know you have a Universal Binary? I've got my stuff to compile but Command-I doesn't say anything about architecture so how can I tell if it worked? is there any additional package contents I can look for?


If you use file on a universal binary it should say something like

Foo: Mach-o fat file with 2 architectures
Foo (for architecture ppc):    Mach-O executable ppc
Foo (for architecture i386):    Mach-O executable i386

or lipo -detailed_info Foo

Fred
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >x86 Compilation (From: Thomas Davie <email@hidden>)
 >Re: x86 Compilation (From: Manfred Schubert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: x86 Compilation (From: Robert Tillyard <email@hidden>)
 >Re: x86 Compilation (From: Frederick Cheung <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: PyObjC, CamelBones, etc. (WAS Re: Rosetta : Prevernece Panels vs. ScreenSavers?)
  • Next by Date: Re: x86 Compilation
  • Previous by thread: Re: x86 Compilation
  • Next by thread: Re: x86 Compilation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread