Re: PyObjC, CamelBones, etc. (WAS Re: Rosetta : Prevernece Panels vs. ScreenSavers?)
Re: PyObjC, CamelBones, etc. (WAS Re: Rosetta : Prevernece Panels vs. ScreenSavers?)
- Subject: Re: PyObjC, CamelBones, etc. (WAS Re: Rosetta : Prevernece Panels vs. ScreenSavers?)
- From: Sherm Pendley <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:03:23 -0400
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
As for PyObjC, RubyCocoa, CamelBones, and the other bridges, the
bridge code only needs to be done once and it is just a matter of
figuring out the ABI. I'm sure that information is either
available now or will be soon. More likely than note, one of the
already supported ABIs for Intel will "just work" (at least, in the
case of FFI -- I don't know what the other bridges are using).
The more I read, the less I worry. :-)
CamelBones uses ffcall, although I could switch to ffi if I really
needed to.
It seems that "fat" binaries are already supported by Perl, at least
to some extent. The support might need some dusting off and updating,
but it won't need to be created from scratch, and Very Smart People
are already hard at work on the problem.
sherm--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Hire me! My resume: http://www.dot-app.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden