Re: x86 Compilation
Re: x86 Compilation
- Subject: Re: x86 Compilation
- From: Clayton Leitch <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:21:55 -0400
Further update: The actual executable more than doubles in size.
However, all the resources in the bundle are used by both the i386
and ppc. Thus, there was a 5% growth in the .app bundle but a 105%
growth in the actual executable file.
Hope this helps
On Jun 8, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Clayton Leitch wrote:
Well, I have a small program compiled for ppc and fat. The ppc is
884 KB and the fat is 928 KB. This is about 5% larger.
On Jun 7, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Rail Jon Rogut wrote:
So what's the size difference between a universal binary and the
ppc binary?
Rail
------------------------------------------------------------
Recording Engineer/Software Developer
Rail Jon Rogut Software
http://www.railjonrogut.com
mailto:email@hidden
-----Original Message-----
From: cocoa-dev-bounces+railro=email@hidden
[mailto:cocoa-dev-bounces+railro=email@hidden]On
Behalf Of
Manfred Schubert
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:35 PM
To: Thomas Davie
Cc: cocoa List
Subject: Re: x86 Compilation
Am 07.06.2005 um 01:17 schrieb Thomas Davie:
Has anyone got x86 compilation working, I just installed XCode2.1
(with every option turned on) and get this:
(Half a million symbols)
After setting the Cross-development SDK to "Mac OS X 10.4
(Universal)" it compiles fine for me. Whether it actually would run I
can not tell of course.
Manfred
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.5 - Release Date: 6/7/2005
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden