• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?


  • Subject: Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?
  • From: john <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:11:39 -0400

How do you think it is possible? Apple should demand C++ committee to change their bool to match BOOL, and the whole world of C++ developer should agree? Or to change BOOL and take break compartability with existing Obj-C codebase?

I'm also wondering why having both BOOL and bool is a "problem" worth complaining about. Granted, I didn't see the beginning of this thread, but it seems to me if someone is having issues because of these 2 existing types they have more important things to worry about.

-- John
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?
      • From: Todd Blanchard <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types? (From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: self
  • Next by Date: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?
  • Next by thread: Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread