• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...


  • Subject: Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...
  • From: Robert Claeson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:21:21 +0200


On 9 jun 2005, at 08.12, Henry McGilton wrote:

When the Intel port was available, I selected the appropriate
switches in Project Builder to compile for Next and Intel,
generated the (fat) binaries, and all ten apps ran quite
flawlessly without my having to change a single line of code.

Exactly my experience, too. The Intel transition will be a no-brainer.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility... (From: Keith Blount <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility... (From: Henry McGilton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...
  • Next by Date: Re: Why are BOOL and bool distinct types?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Universal Binaries, x86 and compatibility...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread