Re: Outline and Table back to front
Re: Outline and Table back to front
- Subject: Re: Outline and Table back to front
- From: Gorazd Krosl <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:08:12 -0400 (EDT)
>>> Not all outline views are table views, however,
all >>>table views
>>> are outline views, therefore outline view should
be higher the the
>>> hierarchy.
>>>
>>>
>> I don't see how "not all outline views are table
>>views" possibly
>> makes sense.
>>
>> A table view has rows and columns. An outline view
has rows and
>> columns and contracted/expanded widgets and
>>indentation. Not all
>> table views have contracted/expanded widgets and
>indentation.
>> Therefore all outline views are table views, but
not >>all table
>> views are outline views. Thus table view is the
>>superclass.
>No, you just contradicted yourself - table views do
>not have the
>ability to collapse/expand items - therefore
logically >any object
>with this ability is *not* a table view.
Since NSObject can't store strings, how can it be
superclass of NSString?
Gorazd
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden