• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: loop efficiency & messages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: loop efficiency & messages


  • Subject: Re: loop efficiency & messages
  • From: John Stiles <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:45:27 -0800

On Mar 23, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:


On Mar 23, 2005, at 6:26 PM, John Stiles wrote:

On Mar 23, 2005, at 10:00 AM, Philip Mötteli wrote:

So IMHO, the reason, why KVC is looking also into the "get" version, is due to historic reasons and is definitely not good coding style. Apple might optimize this case away at any time.

Nope. Once it's documented, it isn't changing. They can't break shipping apps.

Um, no, deprecated code is free to disappear at any time. Why do you think you can't create System 7's open/save dialogs any more? It usually won't disappear because it tends to upset developers - but you should never rely on it always being there.

What?!?

Bull. Standard File went away because all of InterfaceLib went away, at the advent of OS X and Carbon. Carbonization automatically required major changes to all apps--everyone was forced to make huge updates to their codebase for the many, many updated APIs. EVERY shipping app required a rebuild to support Carbon. That's the kind of change that happens once every 20 years. Apple is not going to obsolete all known Cocoa apps for a very, very, very long time--and when they do, there will be bigger changes than this, I promise you.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: loop efficiency & messages
      • From: Philip Mötteli <email@hidden>
    • Re: loop efficiency & messages
      • From: Thomas Davie <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: Will Mason <email@hidden>)
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: Charilaos Skiadas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: Sherm Pendley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: Charilaos Skiadas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: Philip Mötteli <email@hidden>)
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: John Stiles <email@hidden>)
 >Re: loop efficiency & messages (From: Thomas Davie <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: loop efficiency & messages
  • Next by Date: Re: Case insensitive autocomplete
  • Previous by thread: Re: loop efficiency & messages
  • Next by thread: Re: loop efficiency & messages
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread