Re: A Challenge WAS Accessor method idioms...
Re: A Challenge WAS Accessor method idioms...
- Subject: Re: A Challenge WAS Accessor method idioms...
- From: Marcel Weiher <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:45:15 +0000
On 25 Mar 2005, at 15:35, Mike Ferris wrote:
While auto-accessors is a neat idea, and one that I have thought
about a bit, it would have to be done in a way that does not involve
forwarding (at least after the first use).
Use accessor-macros? Although the C processor is a bit crufty for this
sort of thing.
There are ways to accomplish this, perhaps along the lines of how
auto-KVO is implemented. In this case it might even be doable
without dynamic subclassing. I may look into this eventually.
Of curse, I still want the accessors declared in my header and
documented. And, of course, then the compiler's gonna whine about my
"incomplete" class...
Unless those methods are actually implemented, see above.
Marcel
--
Marcel Weiher Metaobject Software Technologies
email@hidden www.metaobject.com
The simplicity of power HOM, IDEAs, MetaAd etc.
1d480c25f397c4786386135f8e8938e4
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden