• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled


  • Subject: Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
  • From: "Mark Munz (DevList)" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:49:21 -0500


On May 15, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Andreas Mayer wrote:

Am 16. Mai 2005 um 02:59 Uhr schrieb Mark Munz (DevList):

Well OK a user probably wouldn't copy a file into Library, but an application that needs to install files in /Library/ definitely would.

Why would any application *need* to install anything in /Library?

If it's only installed for the current user, ~/Library will do just fine.

If the app is to be placed in /Applications - well, then you'll need an installer anyway ...

The last thing I want to do is open my app to possible exploitation because all I wanted to do was copy some files into / Library


Again: Why would you want to do that? I really hate it when apps require system wide installation.

It's been a while since I've addressed the issue in my code, but as I recall there were problems when I tried running my BOA helper app from inside my Contents folder (specifically, I believe users couldn't update the application because it was in use).


I didn't want to require an installer for the user just so I could install my BOA app, so I end up copying it to the ~/Library/ folder. But I've had complaints that it should be in the /Library/ folder because of the "size" (it's 1.2MB, which I don't think is a big deal, but obviously my customers disagree).

So, in this case, copying to the ~/Library/ folder is less desirable and according a specific administrator customer, a security risk (apparently because the virus could modify the application -- since the user has permission to write to it).

Thus, I would *need* to copy the BOA to the /Library/ folder.

If there is a better way to deal with this (that still keeps it simple for the end user), I'd love to know. The biggest issue I had was that the Finder won't let people replace the application with a new version because the BOA is in use.

Yes, I could train the user to put the old file in the trash and then copy over the new file. I could also use an installer. But that isn't the Macintosh way.

Mark Munz


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
    • Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
      • From: Andreas Mayer <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled (From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled (From: "Mark Munz (DevList)" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled (From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled (From: "Mark Munz (DevList)" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled (From: Andreas Mayer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
  • Next by Date: Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
  • Previous by thread: Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
  • Next by thread: Re: FSCopyObjectAsync: useless and crippled
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread