• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: NSFileManager and Mac OS X: fully compatible before the end of days?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSFileManager and Mac OS X: fully compatible before the end of days?


  • Subject: Re: NSFileManager and Mac OS X: fully compatible before the end of days?
  • From: "Mark Munz (DevList)" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:53:00 -0500

I think the problem with the new algorithm is that betterIdea is not defined.
Is that betterIdea for another, different API? Isn't that ALWAYS the case (it's always fun to create new APIs in new areas)?


NSFileManager is due for some overhaul and if more requests makes the overhaul a higher priority, then all the better. I don't believe Cocoa developers should be forced to use Carbon APIs to do common file operations. The performance and functionality of the Cocoa APIs should match those of the Carbon APIs.

It is no better than the "use terminal" (which, sadly, has become more common) as an alternative to a GUI interface for certain features and preferences of an application. It is OK for the more obscure things, but I've seen more applications making common use of terminal as an interface. It is OK to use Carbon APIs for some of the more hardcore stuff, but Cocoa APIs that are nearly as efficient as the Carbon APIs for file management is not an unreasonable request, IMHO.

If a lot of people make the request, then it would seem they find it to be an important area to focus on. Intelligence should also be used in determining what the needs of the "other" customer (the developer) are, and part of that what people want Apple to focus on -- and that's where voting would come in. :)

Mark Munz


On May 21, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:

On Fri, 20 May 2005 13:57:19 -0400, Scott Anguish <email@hidden> said:


On May 20, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Scott Stevenson wrote:



On May 20, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Stéphane Sudre wrote:


Is it worth filing a request enhancement to have the NSFileManager
API being fully compatible with Mac OS X or is it already in the
pipeline?


It's always worth it. More requests = higher priority.



the problem with this is that you're assigning higherPriority to moreRequests

you want to be testing equality I think.. so
moreRequests==higherPriority.


The problem is that the algorithm itself is wrong. It should be:

   betterIdea==higherPriority

These things should be prioritized using intelligence, not voting. m.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: NSFileManager and Mac OS X: fully compatible before the end of days? (From: Matt Neuburg <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Online Help Creation in XCODE
  • Next by Date: Strategy for using common classes in multiple Cocoa plug-ins?
  • Previous by thread: Re: NSFileManager and Mac OS X: fully compatible before the end of days?
  • Next by thread: AddressBook-like TextFields?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread