Re: Frameworks
Re: Frameworks
- Subject: Re: Frameworks
- From: Brian Bergstrand <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:17:06 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My 2 cents:
1) You have a single point of failure - crack the framework and
you've cracked all apps that use it.
2) All your symbols are public, making gdb work much easier.
On Nov 3, 2005, at 4:43 AM, Kiel Gillard wrote:
Hi all,
I'm considering organising my registration/shareware related
classes, resources and other code (that is, serial number
validation, purchasing methods etc) into a framework, so I can
easily re-use them for future projects. However I am not sure how
secure this is, as opposed to having the code directly linked in my
application. I also don't have much experience with frameworks
other than including them in my code.
What do you all recommend, or what are you thoughts on this? Would
it be a bad or insecure idea to organise my registration-related
code into a framework? Would it be easier for a geek to score a
free copy of my application by hacking my framework instead of
hacking the entire application?
Thanks in advance!
Kiel :-)
"Don't frown. You never know who is falling in love with your smile."
Brian Bergstrand
<http://www.bergstrand.org/brian/> PGP Key ID: 0xB6C7B6A2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFDakYbedHYW7bHtqIRAti8AKCI6xbexHoyd6/h7eNpFZx0nV5ijACgpEsI
5Azetm2sPkGiDwe03X6xDJk=
=ilMV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Frameworks (From: Kiel Gillard <email@hidden>) |