Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: CIImage slower than NSImage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CIImage slower than NSImage?

Subject: Re: CIImage slower than NSImage?
From: Markus Hitter <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:19:31 +0100


Am 22.11.2005 um 18:54 schrieb Kenny Leung:

Also, the 128-bit floating point version of an image performs better than the 32-bit integer version!

Not surprising. Floating point is faster than Integer. AltiVec is floating point. Welcome to the PowerPC processor.


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >CIImage slower than NSImage? (From: Kenny Leung <email@hidden>)
  >Re: CIImage slower than NSImage? (From: Milton Sagen <email@hidden>)
  >Re: CIImage slower than NSImage? (From: Kenny Leung <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: CIImage slower than NSImage?

Next by Date:
Re: Screen Resolution and Screen Size

Previous by thread:
Re: CIImage slower than NSImage?

Next by thread:
Re: CIImage slower than NSImage?

Index(es):

Date
Thread