Re: Extension of CoreData to third party databases.
Re: Extension of CoreData to third party databases.
- Subject: Re: Extension of CoreData to third party databases.
- From: Ruslan Zasukhin <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:37:52 +0200
- Thread-topic: Extension of CoreData to third party databases.
On 11/29/05 9:38 PM, "Bill Bumgarner" <email@hidden> wrote:
Hi Bill,
Bill, let's forget this noise about SQL Lite performance.
Who like it let use it. Who have problems let think.
It is more interesting discuss technical aspects of Core Data model.
What have excite me, is that I have read that CoreData is designed without
thinking about some particular db, and wow, without thinking only about
relational model.
It seems I have read this few months ago on Apple site.
I hope I have understood correctly. :-)
So this excite me, because Valentina have Object-Relational model.
> Please file an enhancement request via bugreport.apple.com giving
> technical details as to how such an integration might be done from
> the perspective of Valentina. It will come back as a dupe as many
> developers have asked for access to external databases, but the Core
> Data team will definitely appreciate your product's unique perspective.
Okay, so it looks, up to know, not exists any third party solution
for Core Data?
> ---
>
> Bringing this back around to Core Data; the goal of CD is to be store
> agnostic and to offer complete object graph management to the Cocoa
> developer.
>
> While storage is a critical feature to Core Data, the fact that it can
> transparently manage changes, including validation, across an object graph is
> the more valuable asset.
>
> As for storage, there are certain patterns of behavior available with the
> SQLite store that cannot be achieved with the other store types; partial
> object graphs, faulting, memory footprint pruning, etc...
The most interesting question I have is:
if CoreData developers can catch project where they will have
many tables, many links between tables, and a lots of records?
Up to know, CoreData texts sounds to me like some tool which simplify for
__application__developer__ work with prefs, persistence of objects like size
and location of windows and so on.
Deal is that I very not like e.g. Idea of OO DBMS when they try totally hide
work with database backend. So developer think it work just with C++
objects. This is way to troubles sooner or later.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden