Re: only defined for abstract class
Re: only defined for abstract class
- Subject: Re: only defined for abstract class
- From: Francis Derive <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:12:35 +0200
On Oct 4, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Pontus Ilbring wrote:
On 10/4/05, Francis Derive <email@hidden> wrote:
How do you understand that ? Can't "addObject:" be found in the super
class of "SousClasse" - that is NSMutableArray ?
@interface SousClasse : NSMutableArray {
Class laClasse;
}
- (id) init;
- (id) initWithClass:(Class) aClass;
@end
NSMutableArray is an abstract class.
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/
CocoaObjects/Articles/ClassClusters.html
That's real life instead of vague simple minded principles, and I am
going to see what is an abstract class all about.
Merci beaucoup.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden