Re: only defined for abstract class
Re: only defined for abstract class
- Subject: Re: only defined for abstract class
- From: Kay Roepke <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:01:16 +0200
I wrote:
To still be able to make methods abstract an force the subclasser
to implement them, typically an exception is raised, or a message
doesNotImplement is sent (This stems from Smalltalk, which also
has no abstract keyword.).
This is not entirely true: the message name is not doesNotImplement,
but rather subclassResponsibility, which makes at lot
more sense ;-) I should have more sleep...
- Kay
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden