• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder


  • Subject: Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder
  • From: Ricky Sharp <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:42:19 -0500


On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:26 PM, John McLaughlin wrote:

I was pounding my head against a bug last night that ended up being caused by the fact that I had used [super init] within initWithCoder instead of [self init] (I set up some notifications in [self init] that, well, weren't being set up)

It got me to thinking, it seems the convention is to call [super init] within initWithCoder, most code examples do this. Is there a reason you wouldn't as a rule call [self init]?

Not sure what examples you're looking at, but implementations of initWithCoder: I've seen (as well as what I personally do):


- (id)initWithCoder:(NSCoder*)aCoder
{
    if ((self = [super initWithCoder:aCoder]) != nil)
        {
        [self setThis:[coder decodeObjectForKey:@"MyThis"]];
        [self setThat:[coder decode...
        }

    return self;
}

You often then have a designated initializer (perhaps just init) on the object. In those inits, I just call the same accessors as I do in initWithCoder.

Finally, for other non-archived attributes, or other things that need to be set up, why not create a separate method (e.g. setDefaults) and call it from both initWithCoder and your various other init methods?


The only reason I can think of offhand is a little performance hit (since possibly you are creating object in [self init] that you promptly overwrite in initWIthCoder) but except for that I really can't think of a good reason not to call [self init] (which, of course, will call [super init]) and it seems to me to be a best practice.



Am I missing something obvious here?

-John

John McLaughlin
http://www.loghound.com
email@hidden



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

___________________________________________________________ Ricky A. Sharp mailto:email@hidden Instant Interactive(tm) http://www.instantinteractive.com

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder
      • From: John McLaughlin <email@hidden>
References: 
 >[self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder (From: John McLaughlin <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder
  • Next by Date: Re: Tabs and Documents Design Considerations
  • Previous by thread: Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder
  • Next by thread: Re: [self init] vs. [super init] in initWithCoder
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread