• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: About Universal Binaries...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: About Universal Binaries...


  • Subject: Re: About Universal Binaries...
  • From: Shaun Wexler <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:52:01 -0800

On Feb 1, 2006, at 12:20 AM, Rosyna wrote:

I think that's the crux of it. Very many of the currently released fat binaries have actually never been tested on an ICBM. And very, very few were ever tested on a DTK.

Don't release a fat binary just so you can be in the Universal Binary club. Release it with confidence after much testing.

Ack, at 1/31/06, John Stiles said:

Basically, I wouldn't release an app without testing it, but it's not too scary in general.

... "Just because it compiles, doesn't mean it will work."

;)
--
Shaun Wexler
MacFOH
http://www.macfoh.com

Sarchasm \sar"chasm\, n. the void between the author of a satirical witticism and the recipient who just doesn't get it.


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: About Universal Binaries...
      • From: email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: About Universal Binaries... (From: Rosyna <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: NASM ld support?
  • Next by Date: Using C++ iostreams for file IO in Cocoa
  • Previous by thread: Re: About Universal Binaries...
  • Next by thread: Re: About Universal Binaries...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread