Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++

Subject: Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
From: Markus Hitter <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:14 +0100


Am 02.02.2006 um 16:55 schrieb Rick Langschultz:

I was wondering if I should use objective-c or Objective-C++.


Using Obj-C++ without a need for it is asking for trouble, IMHO.


Am 02.02.2006 um 17:58 schrieb Paul J. Lucas:

The Objective-C part of Objective-C++ is exactly the same.  The
latter allows C++ syntax, but adds nothing to the "Objective-ness".

Well, some people started to use C++ inside Obj-C intentionally. Something like "Use Obj-C classes within C++ and use C++ classes within Obj-C, whatever fits your need at hand best". The resulting mix is a mess, IMHO. Not to mention the slow compile times and suboptimal runtime performance.


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
From: John Stiles <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Objective-C or Objective-C++ (From: Rick Langschultz <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
another NSAnimation crash

Next by Date:
Re: Fix Depracated call in Apple Sample Code?

Previous by thread:
Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++

Next by thread:
Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++

Index(es):

Date
Thread