Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
- Subject: Re: Objective-C or Objective-C++
- From: Glen Simmons <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:20:45 -0600
On Feb 3, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Thomas Engelmeier wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Rick Langschultz wrote:
>I was wondering if I should use objective-c or Objective-C++. I
want to know if there is some sort of >speed test, or any other
type of test that I should be doing to analyse that statement.
Both code-
> bases carry out the same functions. I do like Objective-C more
though. Any opinions?
> For exactly the same code, what do you think will be different
between the two?
A valid C source is not always a valid C++ source. Especially if it
contains abnomiations like pointers to distictive types assigned
back and forth to void pointers, left alone function pointers
passed as void pointers..
Regards
Tom"Surprise, surprise, 'id' is typedef for 'void *' "E
Uh, no. id is a pointer to a struct. See <objc/objc.h>
Glen
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden