Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying?
Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying?
- Subject: Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying?
- From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:23:25 -0800
On Jan 2, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Hamish Allan wrote:
It seems clear to me and at least a couple of others that there is
an problem with this, but not to you. I'd like to file a bug
report, but I'm obviously not doing a very good job of explaining
the problem.
Is it just not plain to you why someone might want to proxy data
without making a copy of it? Daniel's locally-cached remote model
seems to me to be a good example of this.
I think we're at crossed purposes. I can certainly see some value in
filing an enhancement request, but it wasn't clear to me this was the
direction you were heading. My point was that there isn't any API
available today that does what you want, and the solution is to use a
copy of the data. Note, of course, that you're not making a copy of
the original data, but rather the derived value.
mmalc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden