Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: threads or processes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: threads or processes?

Subject: Re: threads or processes?
From: Michael Rothwell <email@hidden>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:44:32 -0500

On Jan 28, 2006, at 11:25 AM, John Stiles wrote:

At any rate, I agree that one process per connection is expensive. However, it's what Apache used to do IIRC (and maybe still does, I don't know), so it can't be /that/ awful.

A machine running Apache with >100 child processes is probably a busy dedicated webserver, not some guy's desktop running an application.

Look at using CFSockets added to the runloop.

--
Michael Rothwell
email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: threads or processes?
From: Andrew Farmer <email@hidden>
Re: threads or processes?
From: Daniel Jalkut <email@hidden>


References:  
  >threads or processes? (From: Andrew Bush <email@hidden>)
  >Re: threads or processes? (From: Andrew Farmer <email@hidden>)
  >Re: threads or processes? (From: John Stiles <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Approach suggestions wanted

Next by Date:
Re: threads or processes?

Previous by thread:
Re: threads or processes?

Next by thread:
Re: threads or processes?

Index(es):

Date
Thread