• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased


  • Subject: Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased
  • From: Eric <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:42:08 -0700

Thanks for all your response.  Here's another memory related problem I've
just hit upon:

NSCell has the property "representedObject".  If I subclass NSCell and set
and use the property from within my subclass (by calling
setRepresentedObject:), then can I assume it will be automatically
deallocated in [super dealloc]?  In other words, I can just use this
property without doing anything.

Thanks again,
Eric
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased
      • From: Lon Giese <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased (From: Eric <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased (From: Jim Correia <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased (From: Jim Correia <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Question regarding a built app
  • Next by Date: Re: Using CLI arguments in controller (scoping?)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased
  • Next by thread: Re: Should objects returned by indirection be autoreleased
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread