RE: RE: swizzling a class to a subclass inorder to add ivars (& methods) to a class
RE: RE: swizzling a class to a subclass inorder to add ivars (& methods) to a class
- Subject: RE: RE: swizzling a class to a subclass inorder to add ivars (& methods) to a class
- From: "Michael Latta" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:46:39 -0800
Given that the WWDC sessions were given to the public I assumed that content
was not under NDA. Was I incorrect?
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Erickson [mailto:email@hidden]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:38 AM
> To: Michael Latta
> Cc: Mike Abdullah; email@hidden
> Subject: Re: RE: swizzling a class to a subclass inorder to add ivars (&
> methods) to a class
>
> On 10/30/06, Michael Latta <email@hidden> wrote:
> > They are making several changes in 64 bit to allow them more control
> over
> > the metadata which gives them more room for performance optimizations
> and
> > such. They are replacing all metadata structures with APIs and hiding
> the
> > implementation details (which is how it should be).
> >
> > One of the outcomes of this is that when a superclass grows in size it
> does
> > not break subclasses that added ivars! No more need to reserve space
> for
> > future use.
>
> Don't forget things are still under NDA.
>
> -Shawn
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden