Re: Syntactic sugar
Re: Syntactic sugar
- Subject: Re: Syntactic sugar
- From: Daniel Jalkut <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:39:33 -0400
Another problem is that by changing the behavior of a developer's
code without their explicitly changing it is a lot harder to warranty.
Because of the differing requirements between the old exception
handling and the new, who's to say some correct behavior in the old
wouldn't cause problems when used with the new?
Better to let developers explicitly choose which mechanism to use,
even after they've turned on support for the new feature.
Daniel
On Sep 5, 2006, at 1:14 PM, John Stiles wrote:
There may not be an easy way for the header to know whether you
have enabled that compiler setting or not.
On Sep 5, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Keith Ray wrote:
I wonder why the macros are not redefined to use @try etc. when
the compiler
is set to enable that syntax.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden