Re: MSSQL
Re: MSSQL
- Subject: Re: MSSQL
- From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:11:30 -0800
> Migrate to a different database! ;o)
Maybe he doesn't have a choice.
Hence the smiley.
Assuming MSSQL and Sybase Server are still one in the same, it was
actually a damned fine database server the last time I checked. Not
terribly surprising given that Microsoft bought a code drop of Sybase
in the '90s and based SQL Server off of that code, adding a relatively
nice graphical front end.
At that point, it was described as "an excellent database server whose
only weakness is the requirement to run on Windows NT".
Now, admittedly, it has been a while since I have worked with
Microsoft's SQL Server. Maybe the quality has ceased in the
interim. Maybe not.
To bring this back around to Cocoa, you can still use Core Data in
such as situation. In particular, you can use Core Data as a local
cache for the remote data -- either persisting in an in-memory store
or into a local on-disk store (most likely SQLite) -- and subsequently
take advantage of a bunch of the object graph management and cocoa
integration features of Core Data.
b.bum
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >MSSQL (From: Benjamin Gereon Bailey <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: MSSQL (From: "Finlay Dobbie" <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: MSSQL (From: Derek Chesterfield <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: MSSQL (From: "Finlay Dobbie" <email@hidden>) |