Re: Simple dealloc question
Re: Simple dealloc question
- Subject: Re: Simple dealloc question
- From: Robert Cerny <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:27:39 +0200
Hi Bob,
you're right, it's completely sufficient to release track object.
However, setting it to nil helps tracking possible bugs in your code,
because you will immediately see in the debugger that you are sending
messages to nil object.
HTH
Robert
On 15.10.2007, at 9:58, Bob Ueland wrote:
Found the following code in an example (track is a pointer to a
Track object)
- (void)dealloc
{
[track release], track = nil;
[super dealloc];
}
What is the point of having track = nil? Wouldn't the following
code be enough?
- (void)dealloc
{
[track release];
[super dealloc];
}
Bob
______________________________________________________________________
______________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel
today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden