• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: !foo vs foo == nil
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: !foo vs foo == nil


  • Subject: Re: !foo vs foo == nil
  • From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:49:37 -0600
  • Thread-topic: !foo vs foo == nil

> The "except as previously specified" in 6.3.2.3 5 refers back to
> 6.3.2.3 3. Without the "except as previously specified", 6.3.2.3 5
> would directly contradict 6.3.2.3 3 (i.e. it would render the
> conversion from a null pointer constant to a null pointer undefined).

Right. But I'm talking about "except as previously specified" in 6.3.2.3
*6*, which refers to absolutely nothing.


--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: !foo vs foo == nil
      • From: "Clark Cox" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: !foo vs foo == nil (From: "Clark Cox" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Design Question: Pro & Cons of KVC/KVO
  • Next by Date: Re: Cheap quality improvements (was Re: !foo vs foo == nil)
  • Previous by thread: Re: !foo vs foo == nil
  • Next by thread: Re: !foo vs foo == nil
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread