Re: NSPersistentDocument packages update
Re: NSPersistentDocument packages update
- Subject: Re: NSPersistentDocument packages update
- From: Mike Abdullah <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:37:30 +0000
My advice is not to bother. Just subclass NSDocument directly and
implement the Core Data side of things there. It really isn't too much
work.
Mike.
On 3 Dec 2008, at 09:42, Paul Tomlin wrote:
I'm looking for the current best practice for convincing
NSPersistentDocument to work with document packages.
I've found quite a few references online[1] which indicate this is/
was a known issue and there seem to be a few workarounds. What I'm
wondering is if the stuff I've discovered is 'current', since I
don't seem to be able to find anything circa 2008.
The current Apple docs still state that NSPD doesn't play nice with
file wrappers, so I assume you still need to work around this issue
and I've not seen an Apple Approved (tm) example.
A quick pointer to somewhere would be completely sufficient, I'm
really just Googled out now :)
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://acaro.wordpress.com/2007/07/19/core-data-persistent-packages-revisited/
[1] http://acaro.wordpress.com/2007/07/09/packages-and-core-data-documents/
[1] http://lists.apple.com/archives/cocoa-dev/2007/Jul/msg00103.html
[1] http://www.cocoadev.com/index.pl?NSPersistentDocumentAsPackage
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden