Re: [Foo new] vs [[Foo alloc] init]:
Re: [Foo new] vs [[Foo alloc] init]:
- Subject: Re: [Foo new] vs [[Foo alloc] init]:
- From: "Hamish Allan" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:26:40 +0000
On Feb 15, 2008 11:11 PM, Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Leopard, +new is implemented as return [[self alloc] init]; It is
> equivalent unless a subclass overrides, which is exceedingly unlikely.
And, I would have thought, exceedingly rash. What would be gained by
implementing a non-equivalent behaviour that would outweigh the
potential for confusion and error?
Hamish
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden