• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Inverse Regex Library?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Inverse Regex Library?


  • Subject: Re: Inverse Regex Library?
  • From: Philip Mötteli <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:11:44 +0200

Am 17.07.2008 um 22:33 schrieb Hamish Allan:

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Philip Mötteli
<email@hidden> wrote:

I try to analyze objects, that have been serialized using keyed encoding.
As long as there are only simple values, I have no problem. But the members
of too-many IVars are usually keyed by using something like
"IVarName[0-9]+". I have to filter those out and classify as too- many.
But I can't count on it. Not on the name nor where the number is. Or if
there's a number. It could also be a letter.

Have you considered clustering the strings based on their Levenshtein distances?

Very interesting! This will help me to find the too-manies. But…


What I'm asking is, if you can
identify everything that is not a too-many relationship, find them via
a process of elimination (if it's not something I can identify, then
it must be a too-many).

But I can't make this analysis every-time an object gets serialized. My program would be way too slow.
I should only analyze or reanalyze, when the last solution doesn't work anymore. So ideally I thought, I would create a regex for the too- manies and every-time the key of an encoded IVar drops in, I just test it against the regex, if it belongs to the too-manies.
If at the end, an encoded IVar is left over or a type has changed, I know, that my analysis was not correct. So I reload all the data and redo the analysis. I'm very confident, that I will find the right solution this way after no more than 2 passes. Having to analyze only twice, compared to analyze after every serializing, is way faster._______________________________________________


Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Inverse Regex Library?
      • From: Marcel Weiher <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Inverse Regex Library? (From: Erik Buck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Inverse Regex Library? (From: Philip Mötteli <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Inverse Regex Library? (From: Andy Lee <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Inverse Regex Library? (From: Philip Mötteli <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Inverse Regex Library? (From: "Hamish Allan" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Sign extension in NSNumber / 10.4 SDK???
  • Next by Date: Re: notification when app is moved
  • Previous by thread: Re: Inverse Regex Library?
  • Next by thread: Re: Inverse Regex Library?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread