• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Dot Syntax docs missing?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dot Syntax docs missing?


  • Subject: Re: Dot Syntax docs missing?
  • From: Marcel Weiher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:42:05 -0700


On Jul 19, 2008, at 18:34 , Ian Joyner wrote:

On 19/07/2008, at 11:36 PM, Michael Ash wrote:

The universe of programming languages extends far beyond this little
island of ALGOL-lookalikes. Objective-C messaging syntax is utterly
mundane compared to many common, useful syntaxes used in practical
(but different) languages every day. IMO you do yourself a disservice
if you don't branch out and try some different things once in a while,
and remember that they're just programming languages, and syntax is
just syntax, nothing really all that important.

Except that syntax is the medium to convey meaning, thus to make it easier for others to understand what a program is about. If it were not so, we may as well have stuck to programming machine language in 1s and 0s. Thus syntax is important... or at least the manifestation of that which is important.

Yep. For example, the Smalltalk syntax that Objective-C's 'bracket' syntax is based on went through several iterations until they found one that gave the most readable and predictable results.


I like a Steve Jobs quote from 1996: “Design is a funny word. Some people think design means how it looks. But of course, if you dig deeper, it’s really how it works.” Clean syntax reflects clean functionality. The bracket syntax of Objective-C reflects the fact that it was a preprocessor rather than compiler.

Well, the "square brackets" part. The base syntax inside the brackets is simply Smalltalk keyword syntax, which simply would not have fit into the C syntax without a very clear syntactic separator. At least I don't see a way.


Marcel

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Dot Syntax docs missing? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Dot Syntax docs missing? (From: Jerry Krinock <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Dot Syntax docs missing? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Dot Syntax docs missing? (From: "Michael Ash" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Dot Syntax docs missing? (From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Dot Syntax docs missing?
  • Next by Date: Re: Outline View not retaining objects it uses. Why?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Dot Syntax docs missing?
  • Next by thread: Re: Dot Syntax docs missing?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread