• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles


  • Subject: Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles
  • From: Markus Spoettl <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:40:44 -0700

On Jul 21, 2008, at 11:20 PM, Quincey Morris wrote:
Call me a retro coward, but I absolutely dislike the idea of GC. I just don't see the point of it given the complicated implications it can have.

But I hope you do see the irony of that last statement, in the context of this thread.


I knew this would backfire when I wrote it. What I meant to say was that you give up a lot of control over the inner workings of your application with GC and I don't like that idea too much. Just don't.

Anyway, it's great to have choices, so everyone can use what they think suits them best.

Markus
--
__________________________________________
Markus Spoettl

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Avoiding mutual retain cycles (From: Markus Spoettl <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles (From: Philippe Mougin <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles (From: Markus Spoettl <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles (From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles
  • Next by Date: File types opened by NSDocument architecture
  • Previous by thread: Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles
  • Next by thread: Re: Avoiding mutual retain cycles
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread