Re: ObjC Question - labeled arguments
Re: ObjC Question - labeled arguments
- Subject: Re: ObjC Question - labeled arguments
- From: glenn andreas <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 07:26:15 -0500
On May 22, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
On May 21, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Andrew Farmer wrote:
Interesting - I wasn't aware that unlabeled arguments existed
(primarily because they're not used in Cocoa). I'd stay away from
them, as they're strictly less clear than named arguments, and will
probably confuse other programmers just as they did me.
In the predecessor to Cocoa, NeXTSTEP, there were a handful of
methods that were named with bare arguments.
Many examples can be found here:
http://www.cilinder.be/docs/next/NeXTStep/3.3/nd/GeneralRef/02_ApplicationKit/Classes/Matrix.htmld/index.html
Like:
<c2D.gif> makeCellAt:(int)row :(int)col
It was, for the very reasons you describe, eliminated in the move to
OpenStep and, finally, Cocoa. I don't believe there are any such
methods left in the supported Cocoa API.
b.bum
WebKit DOM methods were ugly like that (only worse, since there are
far more than just one bare argument), though they are at least now
marked as deprecated in 10.5 (but technically still supported).
I remember when they were introduced at a WWDC session, you could just
see the audience getting nauseous. It's funny how after using Cocoa
for a while, "Cocoa abuse" like that seems to be like fingernails on a
chalkboard.
Glenn Andreas email@hidden
<http://www.gandreas.com/> wicked fun!
m.o.t.e.s. | minute object twisted environment simulation
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden