Re: Autorelease Question
Re: Autorelease Question
- Subject: Re: Autorelease Question
- From: Luke Hiesterman <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:53:11 -0800
So thinking gets in the way of understanding and not thinking is the
path to enlightenment?
Sent from my iPhone.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 8:45 PM, Jim Correia <email@hidden> wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:36 PM, Kiel Gillard wrote:
On 21/11/2008, at 2:55 PM, Adam Leonard wrote:
I think this is a bug in the documentation. I am curious to know
what others think.
While your discovery is interesting, maybe we're not supposed to
know how NSString is implemented. Even if on your computer you do
not get double free messages in your run log, a crash or whatever,
I'm all for keeping the memory management rules simple and treating
anything that doesn't contain "alloc] init...]" or "new]" as
autoreleased.
The memory management rules are already simple. There are three rules.
Making up your own interpretations of them, such as "treating
anything that doesn't contain 'alloc] init]' or 'new]' as
autoreleased", is not only incorrect, but gets in the way of a
fundamental understanding of how things work.
What happens to an object before it is handed to you is completely
irrelevant. It doesn't matter. Thinking about what the method might
have done with the object is a waste of mental effort. The only
thing which is important is whether or not you are responsible for
releasing the object.
Jim
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden