• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil?


  • Subject: Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil?
  • From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:05:38 -0700

On Aug 13, 2009, at 03:45, Georg C. Brückmann wrote:

Consider NSURLConnection’s -connectionDidFinishLoading: delegate method:

	- (void)connectionDidFinishLoading:(NSURLConnection *)connection {
		// Do stuff
		[myReferenceToTheConnection release];
		myReferenceToTheConnection = nil;
	}

Now, in the case of NSURLConnection there’s no need to ensure the connection object remains valid until the current autorelease pool gets drained (aka at the end of the current run loop cycle). But one doesn’t always know how a specific class is implemented, and in that case autoreleasing can help you prevent malloc errors.

I admit these are probably edge cases, but I’ve stumpled upon them. So while you may consider this overly cautious, writing such a macro takes about ten seconds – time that is easily saved when using the macro as it saves you one line of code each time you use it.

Pragmatically, autoreleasing 'myReferenceToTheConnection' might be a reasonable solution to a (potential) problem.


In fact, relinquishing ownership of the connection during this method is simply a bug. If you're its owner, you're responsible for preventing it from being deallocated while it's still alive -- and it's still alive.

In this case, you're pretty sure that autoreleasing it keeps it from being deallocated long enough for its lifetime to end, but that's not a safe general assumption. What if the object you're releasing has a pending error message it's going to display after a timer expires (i.e. after the autorelease pool has been drained)?

So, in such cases, you have an object lifetime issue that must be solved on a case by case basis. Sometimes -- maybe most times -- autoreleasing might be an answer, but I don't think that recommending the use of 'autorelease' over 'release' *as a routine safety precaution* is a viable position to take.


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil?
      • From: "Georg C. Brückmann" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil? (From: Jerry Krinock <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil? (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil? (From: Dave Keck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil? (From: "Georg C. Brückmann" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil? (From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil? (From: "Georg C. Brückmann" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Core Data Crash on MOC Release
  • Next by Date: Re: Core Data Crash on MOC Release
  • Previous by thread: Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil?
  • Next by thread: Re: Releasing ivars in -didTurnIntoFault. Should set to nil?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread