• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message


  • Subject: Re: Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message
  • From: Roland King <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:32:55 +0800

I think this is one of those unfortunate messages which comes out before the dealloc method even runs, just entering the dealloc method with registered observers logs it. It's possible it would be better if it was only logged at the point say NSObject dealloc was called, but it's not, it's called at the start of your own dealloc.

That either indicates it's a bug in the message because it doesn't allow for the case where a dealloc method unregisters the things observing it .. or perhaps you're not really supposed to be doing it there. Normally an object will register its interest in observing another object and the same object will then unregister later. It's a little unusual for an object to unhook the objects which are observing it. Actually how are you even doing that, do you have a list of all the objects and paths which are observing you?

I can sort of see how this might happen in practice, you create an object who's lifetime is determined by external factors, but observers hook up to it without retaining it and .. do something with observations of the key properties. Eventually the object gets released because all the other things which cared about it release it and you want to remove the observations and dealloc is the natural place to do that.

I'd try to get it the other way around myself if possible, have the observer retain the object observed and register the observation, then have it drop the observation at a later point and release the object, which then eventually deallocs. I sort of understand how that could be hard if your object lifecycle is complicated and you were trying to use the implicit reference count to manage object lifetime and have the observers not retain and have a sort of weak reference.

Is there something other than dealloc you can use to denote when everything except observers have finished with your object so you can set an observed property which basically says "I'm useless and want to die" and causes any observers to remove the observation and release the object, which will then dealloc?



On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Andreas Grosam wrote:

I'm using key-value-observing where an instance of class MyObservee has been registered for KVO with other objects which observe a value in a key path (e.g.: @"drives.model.port"):

The observee itself unregisters all observers in its dealloc method:

@implementation MyObservee
- (void) dealloc
{
[self removeAllObservers]; // basicly: [self removeObserver:observer forKeyPath:key];


   [super dealloc];
}


The observers are sill alive when the observee receives its dealloc message.


When the observed instance receives its dealloc message, I'm getting this error message in the console, before the first line of code in the dealloc method will be executed (note: BEFORE [super deallocate] has been invoked):


2009-08-28 14:57:49.753 MyApp[886:20b] An instance 0xd21b60 of class MyObservee is being deallocated while key value observers are still registered with it. Observation info is being leaked, and may even become mistakenly attached to some other object. Set a breakpoint on NSKVODeallocateBreak to stop here in the debugger. Here's the current observation info:
<NSKeyValueObservationInfo 0xd38e00> (
<NSKeyValueObservance 0xd39880: Observer: 0xd356e0, Key path: drives.model.port, Options: <New: NO, Old: NO, Prior: NO> Context: 0x16df0, Property: 0xd38990>
...



The class MyObservee does NOT have a sub class - that is, [super dealloc] will not be called somewhere prematurely.
The base class of MyObservee is NSObject.



Am I doing something wrong here?

Thanks in advance for hints.


Regards Andreas Grosam _______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message
      • From: Andreas Grosam <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message (From: Andreas Grosam <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Starting editing for a Row as soon as it is Added.
  • Next by Date: Auto complete accepts on space, any way to change?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message
  • Next by thread: Re: Get error message about registered observers when Object receives dealloc message
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread