Re: Core Data modeling question
Re: Core Data modeling question
- Subject: Re: Core Data modeling question
- From: Jerry Krinock <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:58:42 -0800
On 2009 Dec 04, at 04:37, Mark Smith wrote:
> However... when I do a unidirectional one to many relationship, the compiler (rightly) complains as I do not have inverse relationships. However, it makes no sense to me to clutter up my address object with pointers back to "company" and "contact" and perhaps any other entity down the line that may need an "address."
The conventional solution to this "problem" is to ignore your common sense and just add the inverse relationships to your data model anyhow. I don't believe that any pointers will be created unless Core Data feels like it needs them while running, which if your common sense is correct, it won't.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden