Re: Question regarding nullified relationship objects
Re: Question regarding nullified relationship objects
- Subject: Re: Question regarding nullified relationship objects
- From: Andrew Farmer <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:36:56 -0800
On 09 Feb 09, at 13:06, Jon C. Munson II wrote:
[Jon C. Munson II] My intent with the question was to seek clarity
rather
than make an assumption. The dox don't say what happens, so one is
left to
make assumptions. Given that making assumptions about whether
maintenance
is needed or not is a dangerous proposition (can we say "memory
management"
- I know I'm still working on that phrase), I just wanted clarity.
I would
agree that leaving things around is a bad thing, but I just wanted
to be
absolutely sure. And no, I didn't want to go in and muck with the
file,
neither did I know if there was some process that later needed to be
called
(akin to Microsoft Access Repair & Compact and FoxPro had something
similar
to remove deleted records, rebuild indexes, etc.), hence my question.
Additionally, because Core Data works in a way that I'm not quite
used to,
clarification of the process was/is a good thing.
There is a "VACUUM" operation in SQLite, but that's an implementation
detail (which I imagine that CoreData handles for you).
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden